Tag Archives: crucifixion

Unrepentant, Unbroken ©️

Posted on by

Everywhere his name is spoken, it is spoken as curse. The white Christian male is summoned like a specter, the vessel into which all the sins of history are poured. He wakes condemned, his silence called complicity, his strength branded aggression, his faith mocked as tyranny. Before he can take breath, judgment is already nailed above his head. Before he can rise, the whip is coiled to strike again.

Each lash lands with its bitter refrain. Once his labor was called honor; now it is theft. Once his faith was a lantern; now it is fire set to destroy. Once his steadiness was a gift; now it is cruelty in disguise. Every virtue twisted into vice, every offering spat upon. The circle of blame returns endlessly, as if time itself were bent to hold him in place.

They strip him, scourge him, spit upon him—yet in every strike they glance upward, desperate for his nod. Their whips are sharp but their hearts are weak; they cannot finish their work without his sanction. They cry out that he is the disease, but plead silently for him to say the cure is just. They hang him on the cross and still their eyes flicker: Tell us this is righteous. Tell us we are holy as we drive the nails. Their rage is not complete, for it leans upon him even in its cruelty. They grind him into dust, and yet beg the dust to speak approval back to them.

But he owes nothing. No absolution to their lies, no blessing to their violence, no tribute to the mob that chants for his blood. Their need is endless, but his debt is nothing. He was not born to be ledger or scapegoat, not made to carry the weight of centuries he never lived. The skin they lash does not belong to them, the spirit they mock does not answer to them. His existence is his alone—bought by no tribunal, purchased by no chorus. He was not made to kneel, nor to agree to his own destruction.

So he rises. Not for their applause, not to soothe their conscience, not to grant the benediction they beg for as they crucify him. He rises because rising is thunder, and thunder needs no permission. He rises higher than the lash can follow, until the whips crack only against shadow. He rises until their voices break against the sky, still crying for his approval, still demanding that he say they are good, that their condemnation is holy. But the thunder is his alone, and it answers not with their righteousness but with their ruin.

The Hand That Reaches Still ©️

Posted on by
Reply

It was not the Romans who killed him, though their nails pierced his flesh and their spears opened his side. They were faceless and obedient, the empire’s teeth chewing through another victim. No, the true crime was closer, crueler, more unbearable: his own people condemned him. They had waited centuries for the voice that would break their silence, and when it came, they choked it with their own hands. They chose the criminal over the Christ, the tyrant over the Son of God. In that choice, they pronounced judgment upon themselves. I saw their faces in the torchlight, not rejoicing but hollow, the features of those who have cursed their own bloodline, a curse that would trail them like ash drifting in air long after the fire is gone.

And when his last breath left him, the world fractured. The sky blackened with shame, the earth quaked as if to flee its own crime. I thought I would die in that instant, thought despair itself would strip me of breath and bury me. But I did not die. I remained, stranded in the hour of his absence, staring into the vacancy where he had been. The others wept, the others fled, but I stood rooted as if eternity had fused me to the ground. For grief, when it grows too large, ceases to be grief. It becomes a compass. It points not to solace, not to remembrance, but to pursuit. And pursuit devours a man until only pursuit remains.

I prayed not only to find him but to be possessed by him. If he could not walk beside me, let him walk inside me. If he would not rise to claim the earth, then let him hollow me and use my body as his burning shrine. And then something tore open in me—not death, not release, but a door I had not known could exist. A door allowing me to drape centuries upon seconds, draw what was yet to come into the ruin of now. Empires rose and rotted before my eyes, nations wandered like phantoms, unborn voices whispered with the hush of ghosts—and still his blood lay wet at my feet. I remained beneath the cross, yet I walked corridors where eternity itself bent and moaned.

So I followed him. Not in flesh, but in time, this blasphemous gift that let me step across centuries while still breathing air thick with dust and death. If he had gone into hell, then I would go too. If he had sunk into the pit, then I would sink after him. My body stood still, but my soul dragged itself across the fabric of days as though each moment were a wound I was forcing open. The halls were endless, the silence screaming, shadows bleeding into one another. Yet always, somewhere ahead of me, he slipped further into the dark. And still I reached.

But I know now that finding him will not be enough. For if I discover him in that abyss, if I stand at last face to face with the Christ, my task will be terrible. I must show him he is dead. Only in that unbearable truth can the resurrection burn. He must see himself extinguished, know himself swallowed by death, accept the void pressing against him—only then will he rise. If he forgets, he is lost. If he refuses, he is bound. I must be the executioner of memory, the one to drive the final nail of recognition, so that in that recognition, the grave itself is shattered.

Some men spend themselves chasing wealth, some glory, some the fleeting hand of love. They collapse, one by one, under the futility of their dream. But I pursue only him. Across centuries. Across silence. Across the black halls of hell. Though his people betrayed him and their curse falls upon them like a pall of endless ash, I will not betray my vow. My soul is burned clean of all else. I will not stop. I will stretch time until it screams, I will walk through fire until fire recoils, I will descend until the abyss itself breaks beneath me—and I will not rest until I find him, remind him, and see him rise again.

For pursuit, when it consumes all else, ceases to be pursuit. It becomes haunting. It becomes damnation. It becomes destiny. And I am haunted without release, damned without end, consumed by devotion that burns hotter than hell’s own fire. He is gone, yes, but I am still reaching, still bending time, still tearing eternity apart in search of him. And even if the universe collapses into nothing, I will still be at the center of that ruin, reaching for him in the dark, unwilling to let him go.

And Yet ©️

Posted on by
Reply

The Impossibility of Being Both Catholic and Democrat in Today’s America

Father Anselm Corbett

In the intricate landscape of American politics and religious identity, the intersection of Catholicism and the Democratic Party has become a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. It becomes evident that the confluence of these two identities is increasingly untenable in today’s sociopolitical environment. This essay seeks to explore the inherent contradictions between the core tenets of Catholicism and the platform of the contemporary Democratic Party, ultimately arguing that the two cannot coexist within a single identity without significant compromise of one’s moral and doctrinal integrity.

The Foundations of Catholic Doctrine

To understand why being both Catholic and a Democrat presents a fundamental conflict, one must first consider the immutable principles that form the bedrock of Catholic teaching. Catholicism, with its two-thousand-year history, is not merely a religious affiliation but a comprehensive worldview grounded in natural law, moral absolutism, and the teachings of the Church. At the heart of this doctrine is the belief in the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death, the inviolability of traditional marriage as a sacrament between a man and a woman, and the inherent dignity of every human being, which demands a preferential option for the poor, the marginalized, and the vulnerable.

These principles are not negotiable; they are articulated in papal encyclicals, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the long-standing traditions that trace back to the early Church Fathers. A true Catholic adheres to these teachings not out of blind obedience, but out of a recognition that they represent the ultimate truth as revealed by God. To deviate from these doctrines is to place oneself outside the communion of the Church.

The Democratic Party’s Platform

On the other hand, the Democratic Party, as it stands today, advocates for policies that starkly contrast with Catholic moral teachings. The party’s staunch support for abortion rights, including late-term abortions, stands in direct opposition to the Church’s unwavering stance on the sanctity of life. The legalization and celebration of same-sex marriage, another key issue in the Democratic platform, contradicts the Catholic understanding of marriage as a divine institution designed for the procreation and education of children within a lifelong bond between a man and a woman.

Furthermore, the Democratic Party’s evolving stance on religious liberty, particularly its push for policies that compel religious institutions to act against their beliefs—such as providing contraceptive coverage in health plans—poses a direct threat to the freedom of conscience that Catholics hold dear. These policies signal a broader secular agenda that increasingly marginalizes religious perspectives in the public square, relegating them to the private sphere where they are stripped of their societal influence.

The Incompatibility of Catholicism and the Democratic Agenda

Given these stark differences, it becomes clear that one cannot fully embrace both Catholicism and the Democratic Party without encountering significant cognitive dissonance. To be a Catholic is to adhere to a set of beliefs that are fundamentally at odds with the core positions of the Democratic Party. To attempt to reconcile these differences requires a dilution of one’s faith or a selective adherence to Church teachings—neither of which is tenable for a Catholic who seeks to live in full communion with the Church.

Some might argue that the Democratic Party’s focus on social justice, particularly its advocacy for the poor, the immigrant, and the marginalized, aligns with Catholic social teaching. However, this argument fails to recognize that Catholic social teaching is a seamless garment, where the protection of life from conception to natural death is inseparable from the care for the vulnerable. One cannot claim to champion the poor while denying the most fundamental right of the unborn—the right to life.

The Moral Imperative for Catholics

The impossibility of being both Catholic and Democrat today is not a call for political disengagement, but rather a challenge to Catholics to examine their consciences and make choices that align with the totality of their faith. This may mean supporting policies or candidates that, while not perfectly aligned with Catholic teaching, do not actively undermine its core principles. It may also mean advocating for a renewal within the Democratic Party, urging it to return to a platform that is more inclusive of religious values and respectful of the moral convictions that shape the lives of millions of Americans.

In conclusion, the divergence between Catholicism and the Democratic Party in today’s America is too wide to bridge without compromising the integrity of one’s faith. It is evident that the path forward for Catholics involves a choice: either remain steadfast in the teachings of the Church, or align with a political party that increasingly distances itself from those teachings. The two cannot coexist without significant moral and doctrinal compromises that ultimately erode the essence of what it means to be truly Catholic.