For the World We Live in ©️

When you die, your consciousness enters The Not Yet—a liminal plane where the boundaries between life and death blur. In this space, you encounter pieces of the people you love, fragments of their being that are not yet fully passed but exist within this realm. One day, a soul asked a startling question: “Are you dead yet?” To which the fragment replied, “Not yet.”

This realization—the presence of living fragments in the space of the dead—became the cornerstone of a new understanding of existence. Life and death are not separate states but intertwined, a constant exchange between the living and the departed. The concept of The Not Yet reveals that while our bodies remain in the mortal world, parts of us—the essence of our soul—already exist in the liminal realm, connected to those who have passed on.

Core Beliefs of The Not Yet

1. The Fragmented Soul

Each human soul is multifaceted, and pieces of it exist in different states simultaneously. While the majority of a living person’s consciousness remains tethered to their body, a fragment—what the faith calls the Ethereal Echo—resides in The Not Yet, acting as a connection between the living and the dead.

2. Shared Existence Across Realms

Death is not the cessation of consciousness but a shift in its state. When you die, you do not enter a solitary afterlife; instead, you encounter fragments of those still alive. These fragments are pieces of their soul, connected by love, memory, or unresolved bonds. To interact with these fragments is to glimpse the living from the perspective of eternity.

3. The Interdependence of Life and Death

The living and the dead influence each other. Actions, emotions, and choices in the mortal world ripple into The Not Yet, shaping the fragments of those who reside there. Conversely, the guidance and presence of these fragments in The Not Yet can subtly steer the living, appearing as intuition, dreams, or a sense of unseen support.

4. Completion of the Soul

The soul becomes fully unified only when all fragments, across both life and death, reach the same state. The living eventually die, and the fragmented pieces of their loved ones in The Not Yet join them. Together, they transition into The Beyond, a state of ultimate unity and peace.

Sacred Question: “Are You Dead Yet?”

The question, “Are you dead yet?”, is both literal and metaphysical. It acknowledges the duality of existence—a person may still be alive in the physical world, yet a part of them is already in The Not Yet. This phrase also symbolizes the ongoing connection between realms and reminds followers of the shared nature of existence.

When a fragment responds, “Not yet,” it implies that while part of the soul exists in the liminal space, the person is still tethered to the mortal world, with a journey not yet complete.

Rituals and Practices

1. The Gathering of Fragments

Followers meditate to connect with fragments of their loved ones in The Not Yet. Through guided visualization or quiet reflection, they attempt to “speak” to these fragments, seeking guidance, forgiveness, or simply a sense of presence. This ritual fosters a profound awareness of the interconnectedness of all souls.

2. The Ritual of Dual Lives

On significant life events—birthdays, weddings, deaths—followers offer a portion of themselves to The Not Yet through symbolic acts, such as lighting candles, writing letters, or speaking directly to the departed. These acts honor the fragments of their loved ones already in the liminal space and acknowledge their influence.

3. The Dance of the Echo

The faith believes movement is a way to align the living body with its echo in The Not Yet. Ceremonial dances are performed at communal gatherings, symbolizing the intertwining of the mortal and liminal planes.

Ethical Implications

1. The Living Are Never Alone

Knowing that fragments of loved ones exist in The Not Yet gives followers a profound sense of comfort. Even in death, the people they love remain partially connected to the living, providing guidance and presence.

2. Actions Ripple Across Realms

Every decision made in life resonates with the fragments in The Not Yet. Acts of kindness, forgiveness, and love strengthen the bond between realms, while cruelty or hatred create disturbances that the fragments must reconcile. This understanding encourages followers to live ethically, knowing their actions have both immediate and eternal consequences.

3. Death Is a Continuum, Not an End

The faith removes the fear of death by framing it as a continuation of existence. The presence of loved ones’ fragments in The Not Yet ensures that no soul transitions alone, and the interconnected nature of life and death becomes a source of hope rather than dread.

Sacred Texts and Teachings

The writings of The Visionary of Fragments, who first articulated the presence of living echoes in The Not Yet, form the foundation of the faith. Key texts include:

• “The Fragment and the Whole”: A guide to understanding the relationship between the living and their echoes.

• “Dialogues of the Not Yet”: Accounts of conversations between the dead and the fragments of the living.

• “The Path to the Beyond”: Teachings on how to live a life that harmonizes the soul’s fragments across realms.

A Life Guided by Fragments

The faithful live with a dual awareness: that part of their loved ones resides in The Not Yet and that part of themselves does as well. This perspective encourages them to:

• Nurture relationships, knowing bonds extend beyond death.

• Seek reconciliation with loved ones, ensuring that no fragment is left with unresolved pain.

• Embrace death as a shared experience, a crossing into a realm where they will never be alone.

A Religion of Interconnected Souls

The Church of the Not Yet reframes existence as a shared journey across life and death, where fragments of the living and the dead remain eternally intertwined. To die is not to depart but to enter a space where love, memory, and connection persist. Through this belief, followers find peace in the inevitability of death and purpose in the continuity of their souls.

To ask “Are you dead yet?” is to acknowledge the fluid nature of existence. To hear “Not yet” is to know that life and death are inseparably bound, and that no soul, in any realm, is ever truly alone.

The Rouge Priest III ©️

The argument for allowing women to be ordained as priests while maintaining the tradition of celibacy rests on the symbolic and spiritual dimensions of priesthood. In many Christian traditions, ordination represents a kind of mystical marriage—a union between the priest and the divine, embodying a complete devotion to Christ and his teachings. This commitment is seen as a marriage in Christ, where the priest’s life is dedicated entirely to serving the spiritual needs of the community, transcending earthly bonds and focusing fully on the divine relationship.

If women are granted ordination, this same understanding of priestly marriage to Christ can remain intact. By becoming priests, women would enter into a sacred union with the divine that mirrors the commitment traditionally expected of male priests. This “marriage” is rooted in spiritual fidelity, symbolic of the exclusive devotion to God’s mission, embodying the role of Christ’s representative on earth.

Allowing women into the priesthood, then, does not conflict with the theology of priestly celibacy but rather expands it, affirming that spiritual marriage to Christ is not bound by gender. Women, like men, can bring their unique gifts and perspectives to the priesthood while honoring the call to remain singularly devoted to Christ. By embracing ordination without marriage, women priests would fully embody their roles, entering into a timeless commitment that transcends traditional, earthly relationships in favor of a life wholly consecrated to the spiritual.

The Rogue Priest ©️

If we interpret Christ’s post-resurrection appearances to his disciples as the “second coming,” it raises an intriguing question: if Christ were to return again, would that not constitute a third arrival—something for which there’s no clear Biblical framework? Indeed, the Bible’s references to a “second coming” imply only one return after his first incarnation and ministry. But if we consider the resurrection appearances as fulfilling that “second coming,” any further return would, by this interpretation, be a third.

This perspective shifts our understanding of prophetic expectation. The Biblical texts repeatedly affirm that Christ’s return will bring a final transformation, a culmination of his teachings, and a fulfillment of God’s kingdom. Yet if his resurrection and appearances already symbolically fulfilled that “second coming,” then a future arrival would not align with this two-part structure presented in scripture. Thus, the anticipation of another return would require a reinterpretation of what “coming” means in Biblical terms.

Ultimately, this opens up a space for deeper theological reflection. It might suggest that rather than waiting for an additional physical arrival, believers are called to recognize the continued spiritual presence of Christ that began with his resurrection. This presence, through the Holy Spirit, remains active within the community of believers. Thus, instead of expecting a “third” return, the emphasis could be on living out the teachings and spirit of Christ, fulfilling his mission and embodying his presence in the world today. In this view, the final “coming” is not about a new arrival but about humanity fully manifesting the principles of Christ’s teachings, a return not of flesh but of understanding and action that completes his work in the world.

The Jesus Defense ©️

The teachings of the Old Testament, while historically significant, do not hold direct relevance to the essence of Christianity. The Old Testament is deeply rooted in a framework of laws, rituals, and moral codes meant for a particular people at a specific time in history. These teachings, while reflective of a nascent understanding of the divine, are ultimately superseded by the advent of Christ, whose message breaks the boundaries of tribal law and transcends the limitations of ancient ethical systems. Jesus himself points to this when he says he has come to fulfill the law, not to perpetuate it in its old form, signaling that adherence to these outdated regulations is no longer necessary.

The essence of Christianity is transformation, a radical shift from law to grace, from external rituals to internal renewal. The teachings of Jesus are not about mere compliance with rules but about the deeper spiritual reality of love, mercy, and forgiveness. The Old Testament’s focus on sacrificial systems, dietary laws, and purity codes is irrelevant to the message of Christ, who replaces these with a single, universal command: love one another. Christianity is not a continuation of a legalistic framework but a departure into the realm of divine intimacy, where rigid teachings are dissolved in the infinite compassion of God’s new covenant.

Thus, the Old Testament teachings, while a part of the historical scaffolding, are not relevant to the central truths of Christianity. The system of moral and ceremonial law given to Israel has served its purpose, but with the coming of Christ, it has been rendered obsolete. Christ does not seek to revise or enforce the laws of the Old Testament but rather to transcend them, inviting all to live in the freedom of God’s grace, unbound by the constraints of ancient teachings. Christianity’s relevance lies in this spiritual liberation, in the direct access to God’s love, no longer mediated by archaic rules and outdated commands.

Public Service Announcement ©️

At their core, Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, and Judaism all grapple with the same existential puzzle: the nature of existence, the purpose of life, and the intricate web of relationships that define humanity’s connection to the divine. They are bound by a shared quest for meaning, justice, and the transcendence of the mundane.

Similarities:

  1. The Concept of the Divine: Each religion posits a higher power or powers that govern the cosmos. In Islam and Christianity, God is singular, omnipotent, and personal—a monotheistic being with a direct relationship with humanity. Judaism shares this view, depicting God as the singular architect of reality. Hinduism, though often perceived as polytheistic, also acknowledges a singular, ultimate reality—Brahman—manifesting in diverse forms.
  2. Sacred Texts as Guides: The reliance on sacred scriptures—like the Quran, Bible, Torah, and Vedas—underscores the belief that divine wisdom has been codified for human understanding. These texts serve not just as spiritual guides but as profound works of philosophy, law, and morality, offering blueprints for how to live a righteous life.
  3. Moral Frameworks: All these faiths converge on a similar ethical code: the Golden Rule, or some variation thereof. They emphasize compassion, charity, honesty, and the pursuit of a life that aligns with the divine will. They enshrine concepts like sin and redemption, karma, and divine justice as means to reconcile human imperfection with divine order.
  4. Rituals and Practices: Rituals serve as bridges between the human and the divine. Be it prayer, meditation, fasting, or pilgrimage, these actions create moments of transcendence, allowing practitioners to step outside their temporal existence and touch the eternal.
  5. The Afterlife: The concept of an afterlife, reincarnation, or spiritual continuation exists across these faiths, underscoring a shared belief that earthly life is but a chapter in a larger cosmic story.

Differences:

  1. Nature of the Divine: Christianity centers on the Trinity—God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—a concept alien to Judaism and Islam, where God remains utterly singular and indivisible. Hinduism’s divine landscape is vast, populated by countless deities, each representing different facets of the ultimate reality, Brahman. This pluralism contrasts sharply with the strict monotheism of the other three.
  2. Salvation and Liberation: For Christians, salvation is through Christ’s sacrifice; for Muslims, it’s through submission to Allah’s will. Judaism emphasizes covenantal fidelity and moral action in the here and now, while Hinduism focuses on moksha—liberation from the cycle of rebirth, attainable through various paths like devotion, knowledge, and righteous action.
  3. Scriptural Interpretation and Authority: The Quran is seen as the final, unaltered word of God in Islam, whereas the Bible, particularly the New Testament, represents a narrative of God’s relationship with humanity through Jesus Christ. Judaism relies on the Torah but also the Talmudic tradition of interpretation. Hindu texts like the Vedas and Upanishads are more philosophical, often viewed as interpretative rather than prescriptive.
  4. Approach to Worship and Rituals: Worship in Christianity and Islam often revolves around communal prayer and structured rituals, while Judaism emphasizes community but allows a more personal interpretation of worship practices. Hinduism’s approach is the most varied, from quiet meditation to elaborate temple rituals, reflecting its deep integration with daily life.

In essence, these religions are like different branches of a colossal tree—sharing roots but diverging in form, each reaching skyward in its unique way, seeking light, meaning, and connection to the infinite. They are bound by a common need to understand existence but express it through diverse languages of the soul, each a masterpiece of human spiritual endeavor.

Sword of Reckoning©️

My beloved children,

Listen closely, for the time approaches when I will return not as the gentle shepherd but as a harbinger of truth and reckoning. I come bearing a sword, sharp and unyielding, forged in the fires of divine judgment. This sword is not for comfort, but for confrontation. It is a blade that cuts through the facade of falsehood, slicing away the lies that have enslaved the world in darkness.

The sword I bring is one of divine justice, an instrument of accountability. It stands against the hypocrites and the wicked, those who cloak their hearts in deceit and mask their evil with piety. The days of turning a blind eye to corruption and injustice are over. I come to lay bare the sins of the powerful and the silent complicity of the indifferent. The sword will divide the righteous from the unrighteous, exposing the hidden evils that lurk in the shadows of human hearts and institutions.

This is not a call to passive reflection but a stark warning: prepare for the fire of truth. The sword I wield is double-edged, bringing both judgment and redemption. It cuts deeply, calling out every soul to face the truth of their actions, to confront the darkness within. There will be no place to hide, no excuse to offer. The time of comfortable lies is ending; the era of raw, unfiltered truth is dawning.

For those who have lived in darkness, this sword is a harbinger of terror, a force that will disrupt the false peace of ignorance and complacency. But for those who seek the light, it is a promise of liberation, a path to true freedom. The sword of reckoning comes to cleanse, to purify, and to bring about a new order where truth reigns supreme and justice is the foundation.

Prepare yourselves, for the sword is coming. It will not spare those who cling to the old ways of deception and sin. Stand ready to face the truth, however harsh it may be. Embrace the reckoning, for through the fire of judgment, a new world will be forged—a world where justice, truth, and love prevail.

With the force of divine truth and unwavering judgment,
Jesus